Dismissed

Arulmigu Kalasalingam College v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC17 Feb 2017WA/2189/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ appeal, the court dismissed the appeal as infructuous. The learned counsel for the appellant had filed an endorsement stating that the writ appeal had become infructuous. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs awarded.

Arulmigu Kalasalingam College Vs the State of Tamil… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.02.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶2

W.A.No.2189 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶3

Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Engg, run by Kalasalingam & Anandam Ammal Charities, Rep. by Chairman T.Kalasalingam. .. Appellant/Writ Petitioner

¶4

versus 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶5

The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, "Panagal Building", Saidpet, Chennai - 600 015.

¶6

Rengappa Naickerpatty Panchayat, Rep. by its President, Rengapa Naickenpatty, Virudhunagar, District. .. Respondents/Respondents

¶7

Writ Appeal filed against the order dated 23.07.2010 made in W.P.No.17253 of 2008.

¶8

WP.No.17253 of 2008:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Order of the 1st Respondent dated 05.03.2008 in G.O.Ms No.38 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (PR1) Department and consequential order of the 3rd Respondent dated 19.06.2008 and quash the same.

¶9

For Appellant : Mr.K.Selvaraj

¶10

For Respondents: Mr.T.M.Pappiah (for R1 & R2) Special Government Pleader

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

JUDGMENT

¶13

(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)

¶14

Mr.K.Selvaraj, learned counsel on record submitted that the writ appeal has become infructuous and he has also made and endorsement to that effect.

¶15

Placing on record the above, the instant writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶16

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ars
To
1. The Secretary
State of Tamil Nadu,
Rural Development and
Panchayat Raj Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Director of Rural Development
and Panchayat Raj,
"Panagal Building",
Saidpet, Chennai - 600 015.
+1 cc to Mr.K.Selvaraj Advocate sr 10531
+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 10584
W.A.No.2189 of 2010
kj(co)
aa06/03/2017

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arulmigu Kalasalingam College v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arulmigu Kalasalingam College v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.S.Gandhimathi Vs The District Collector

V.Manivannan Vs the Secretary

K.Shivakumar, Vs Punjab National Bank

Lakshmanan, Vs The Authorized Officer

Dr.M.Rajan Vs The District Collector

Royal Sundaram Insurance Vs Padmavathy