Writ appeal filed under Letters Patent against an order dismissing a public interest litigation regarding a Memorandum of Understanding for tennis courts. The court found the appeal infructuous.
None. The writ appeal and connected petition were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.10.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.A.No.2111 of 2011 And M.P.No.1 of 2011 M/s.Prince Tennis Academy, State Sports Complex Block No.8, Mogappair West, Chennai 600 037. .. Appellant/2nd respondent Vs. 1.M/s.Rankers Tennis Academy Rep by its General Secretary J.Augustine Mani, 122/2, Saptagiri Colony, Thirumangalam, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. 2.The Sports Development Authority of Tamilnadu rep by its Member Secretary 116-A, Periyar EVR High Road, Nehru Park, Chennai 600 084. .. Respondents/Petitioner and 1st Resppondent Prayer:
Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.7905 of 2008 dated 26.08.2011.
WP.No.7905 of 2008: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Hon'ble Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the agenda no.23, dated 13.11.2007 and the consequential order dated 12.2.2008, on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to finalise the process of entering in to Memorandum of Understanding to maintain the tennis courts at Sports comples at Mogappair, based on the offers received in pursuance of calling for 'Expression on interest' dated 11.09.2007.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Vijay Shankar For Respondent : Mr.Zakir Hussain No.2 Government Advocate
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.)
The learned counsel for the appellant made an endorsement indicating that nothing survives for adjudication as the prayer has become infructuous.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the intra court appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/-
ASST. REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST. REGISTRAR To 1. The General Secretary (Mr.J.Augustine Mani) M/s.Rankers Tennis Academy 122/2, Saptagiri Colony, Thirumangalam, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. 2. The Member Secretary The Sports Development Authority of Tamilnadu 116-A, Periyar EVR High Road, Nehru Park, Chennai 600 084. +1 CC to Government Pleader, SR.NO.76238/2017
W.A.No.2111 of 2011 And M.P.No.1 of 2011 SV(CO) VC (22/11/2017)
M/s.Prince Tennis Academy
M/s.Rankers Tennis Academy
The Sports Development Authority of Tamilnadu
K.K.SASIDHARAN
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
