Dismissed

R.Ramachandran v. M/S Management

Madras HC31 Jan 2017WA/1594/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ appeal filed against an order in a writ petition seeking quashing of a labour court order and direction for back wages, the appellant appeared in person but failed to appear at the hearing on the merits. The court, noting the absence, dismissed the writ appeal by default.

What did the court decide?

The writ appeal was dismissed by default; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

R.Ramachandran Vs M/S Management — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 31.01.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR

¶5

and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

W.A.No.1594 of 2010

¶7

and M.P.No.1 of 2010 R.Ramachandran .. Appellant/Petitioner versus

¶8

M/s. Management, Arugavoor Primary Agricultural Co-op, Bank Limited, Arugavoor and Post, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶9

The Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, Chennai - 104. .. Respondents/Respondents Writ Appeal filed against the order dated 06.05.2008 in W.P.No.47127 of 2006.

¶10

Writ Petition filed u/a.226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari by quashing the order of respondent -2 passed in I.D.No.283 of 2006 dated 18.10.2006 and further direct the respondent-1 to provide Rs 20 lakhs as back wages and attendant benefits from the date of suspension and compensation and retirement benefits with 12% interest and with Rs. 3 lakhs cost without prejudice to the right to receive compensation from the state for deprivation of the petitioner right to life in oppressive manner by the corruption practices state officials.

¶11

JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)

¶12

Appeal has been preferred by Mr.R.Ramachandran, party-inperson. On 22.12.2016, there was no appearance and we recorded as hereunder.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

"Mr.R.Ramachandran, party-in-person who had filed the instant appeal has not appeared. Post during third week of January 2017".

¶15

Today also there was no appearance.

¶16

In the abovesaid circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the writ appeal for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
The Presiding Officer,
Principal Labour Court,
Chennai-104.
rsi(co)
krd 23/2
W.A.No.1594 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Ramachandran v. M/S Management

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ramachandran v. M/S Management

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Government of Tamil Nadu Vs Narayanasamy

P.Murthy, Vs The Collector of Cuddalore

Deccan Chronicle Employees Vs The Governor

Mr. T.S. Ramachandran Vs The Registrar

G.Sangameswaran Vs Sundaram Bnp Paribas

M/s.Amd Housing Developers, Vs Authorised Officer