Dismissed

The Director of Handlooms and v. C.Ragupathy

Madras HC16 Nov 2017WA/1443/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed this writ appeal, refusing to interfere with the Single Judge’s order reinstating an employee dismissed without following principles of natural justice. The Court modified the relief by awarding continuity of service but treating the dismissal-to-reinstatement period as leave without salary.

What did the court decide?

Order made in favor of appellant (reinstatement) was upheld, subject to awarding the interim period as leave without salary.

The Director of Handlooms and Vs C.Ragupathy — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 16.11.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶6

W.A.No.1443 of 2017

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.No.19406 of 2017

¶9

The Director of Handlooms and

¶10

Textiles (Functional Registrar Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act), Office of the Director of Handlooms and Textiles, Chennai 600 108.

¶11

The Assistant Director Handloom and Textiles,

¶12

Office of the Assistant Director of

¶13

Handloom and Textiles, Erode.

¶14

The Management of Myladi Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd.,

¶15

rep. by its President Myladi Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd., Chennimalai, Erode District. Appellants

¶16

Versus

¶17

C.Ragupathy

¶18

Mr.K.Thirumoorthy

¶19

Mr.R.Thangarasu

¶20

Mr.V.R.Periyasamy

¶21

Mr.R.Muthusamy

¶22

Mr.S.Thangarasu

¶23

Mrs.R.Jothimani

¶24

Mrs.P.Sumathi

¶25

Mr.M.Puthiyaraj

¶26

Mr.M.Kanagaraj

¶27

Mr.P.Marappan Respondents

¶28

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 4.9.2017 passed in W.P.No.13159 of 2014 on the file of this court.

¶29

WP.No.13159 of 2014 Prayer:preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ in the nature of certiorari calling for the records relating to the order made in Rc.No.41321/2013/H 2-1 dated 21/04/2014 on the file of the

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

Director of Handlooms and Textiles/first respondent herein and quash the same.

¶32

For appellant : Mr.S.T.S.Murthy, AAG assisted by Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram Special Government Pleader For R1 : Mr.S.Natanarajan

¶33

JUDGMENT

¶34

(Judgment of the court was made by HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J.)

¶35

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties on the point.

¶36

It appears that based on certain complaints against the first respondent herein, while he was working as Manager in the appellant-Society, disciplinary proceedings was initiated against him and a punishment of reversion was imposed in the year 2011, however, after three years viz., on 21.4.2014, it was revised by the first appellant herein, suo motu, and the first respondent herein was imposed with a punishment of dismissal from service against which, the first respondent had moved the writ petition and obtained an order in his favour, which is under challenge in the present writ appeal.

¶37

On going through the order passed by the learned Single Judge, we find that the learned Single Judge, having found that the punishment was imposed by suo motu revision without compliance of principles of natural justice, set aside the same and directed for reinstatement of the writ petitioner with all attendant benefits.

¶38

Having regard to the nature of charges and the fact that the suo motu revision was made behind the back of the first respondent, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. However, with regard to backwages is concerned, we make it clear that the period from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement, would be treat as leave without salary applying the well settled principle of 'no work, no pay'. but, with continuity of service for the said period. The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶43

ssk

¶44

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶45

To:

¶46

The Director of Handlooms and Textiles (Functional Registrar Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act), Office of the Director of Handlooms and Textiles, Chennai 600 108. 2. The Assistant Director Handloom and Textiles, Office of the Assistant Director of Handloom and Textiles, Erode. 3. The President, The Management of Myladi Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd., Myladi Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd., Chennimalai, Erode District. +1cc to Mr.L.P.shanmugasundaram, Advocate SR.No.81615 +4cc to Mr.S.Natanarajan, Advocate SR.No.81242 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.82010 W.A.No.1443 of 2017 RSY(CO) GN(20/12/2017)

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Director of Handlooms and v. C.Ragupathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director of Handlooms and v. C.Ragupathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs M.Parivelan

The Tamil Nadu Dr. Mgr Medical Vs Dharma Medical Research and

S.v.S.Educational and Social Vs J.Radhakrishnan IAS

The Chairman, Vs R.Sridhar

The State of Tamilnadu Vs the Principal & Secretary

M.Lakshmanan Vs the Tamilnadu State Marketing