Allowed

T.R.T.Gunasekaran v. the Joint Commissioner

Madras HC23 Oct 2017WA/115/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the intra-court appeal against the dismissal of a writ petition. The petitioners sought appointment as non-hereditary trustees of a temple under a 1986 scheme. The Court held that since the department had not issued a call for applications, the petitioners had a right to seek appointment. The Court directed the Joint Commissioner to consider the appellants' application on me

What did the court decide?

Judgment directed the Joint Commissioner to consider and dispose of the appellants' application dated 11 July 2016 on merits within three months.

T.R.T.Gunasekaran Vs the Joint Commissioner — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 23.10.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶5

W.A NO.115 OF 2017

¶6

1.T.R.T.Gunasekaran 2.Dr.Saravanan 3.N.K.Alwar ...Appellants/Petitioners Vs

¶7

The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religious Charitable and

¶8

Endowment Department, Coimbatore. ...Respondent/Respondent

¶9

Prayer:- Writ Appeal filed under clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P.No.33361 of 2016 dated 23.09.2016.

¶10

W.P.No.33361 of 2016:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus direction the respondent to appoint the petitioners as the non-hereditary trustees of Arulmigu Ramalinga Sowdeeswari Amman Temple, Kovai in consonance with the scheme settled by the respondent in O.A.No.54/85/B1 dated 30.10.1986 based on their applications dated 11.07.2016 made to the respondent.

¶11

For Appellants : Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja

¶12

Special Govt.Pleader (HR & CE)

¶13

K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.

¶14

This intra court appeal is directed against the order dated 23 September 2016, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant in W.P.No.33361 of 2016 for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (hereinafter referred to as "HR & CE" Department) to appoint them as non-hereditary trustees of Arulmigu Ramalinga Sowdeeswari Amman Temple, Kovai, in consonance with the Scheme settled by the HR & CE Department in O.A.No.54/85/B1 dated 30 October, 1986.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The appellants taking into account the Scheme framed in respect of the temple submitted application on 11 July, 2016, requesting the Joint Commissioner to appoint them as nonhereditary trustees of the temple. The application was not considered on the ground that the department is yet to call for applications for such appointment. The appellants therefore filed writ petition in W.P.No.33361 of 2016. The learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the appellants have no right to claim appointment and their right is only to make application whenever notification is issued by the HR & CE Department.

¶17

We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. We have also heard the learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the respondent.

¶18

The Scheme framed by the HR & CE Depart in O.A.No.54/85/B1 dated 30 October, 1986, provides for appointment of non-hereditary trustees to the temple in question. It is a matter of record that the HR & CE Department is yet to appoint non-hereditary trustees to the temple pursuant to the Scheme. It was only in the said circumstances the appellants submitted application on 11 July, 2016. Even though a reply was given on 16 August, 2016 that notification would be issued by the Department, the fact remains that no such notification is issued till date. The respondent cannot be heard to say that the right of the persons, who are relying on the Scheme is only to make an application whenever notification is issued. We are therefore of the view that interest of justice would be sub served by directing the Joint Commissioner to consider the application submitted by the appellants on 11 July, 2016 on merits.

¶19

We therefore, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus by directing the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department to consider and dispose of the application submitted by the appellants dated 11 July, 2016 on merits and as per law. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶20

In the up shot, we allow the intra court appeal. No costs.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶22

//True Copy//

¶23

svki

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

¶26

The Joint Commissioner, The Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment Department, Coimbatore.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham, Advocate, S.R.No.75044 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.74484

¶28

W.A No.115 of 2017

¶29

KK(CO)
CS/13/11/17

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.R.T.Gunasekaran v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.R.T.Gunasekaran v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The District Revenue Officer- Vs Subramani

Land Acquisition Officer & Vs Siddhamal

E.Dakshinamurthy Vs the Principal Secretary/

S.Raman(Deceased) Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

Inspector General of Vs R.Santhosh

Tamilnadu Small Industries Vs s. parvathi