The High Court dismissed a writ appeal for default. The appellant failed to appear despite notice and instructions sent to counsel, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against a previous order regarding registration matters.
The writ appeal was dismissed for default. No costs awarded. Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.02.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
W.A.No.1065 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012
V.Vanaja ... Appellant
vs.
1. The Inspector General of Registration,
Department of Registration,
No.100, Santhome High Road,
Chennai.
2. The District Revenue Officer
(Department of Registration)
No.32, Rajaji Salai,
Chennai-1.
3. The Sub-Registrar,
Department of Registration,
Anna Nagar, Chennai-40. ... Respondents
Writ appeals filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent
filed against the order of this Court made in W.P.No.9072 of
2012, dated 18.04.2012.
WP.9072 of 2012 Prayer: This Writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order dated 3/2012 passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in Na. Ka. C.Pa. No.A3/79/11 and quash the same.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl. Govt. Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgement of this Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)
Writ appeal is directed against the order made in W.P.No.9072 of 2012, dated 18.04.2012.
"On the basis of an affidavit, dated 08.12.2016 of Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel on record, Mr.D.Ravichandran, learned counsel submitted that appeal was entrusted by the husband of the appellant. Matter was listed for final hearing. Appellant was put on notice through e-mail, dated 01.11.2016, sent to her husband and through Speed Post, dated 02.11.2016, seeking further instructions, enabling the counsel to proceed further. There was no reply for the e-mail and Speed Post was returned with the endorsement "Intimation Delivered - Door Locked". As there is no instructions from the appellant, vide affidavit, dated 08.12.2016, he has requested the Court to record the same and pass further orders.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
skm Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF
REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION NO.
100 SANTHOME HIGH ROAD CHENNAI
2 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER
(DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION) NO.32 RAJAJI
SALAI CHENNAI 1
3 THE SUB REGISTRAR
DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANNA NAGAR
CHENNAI 40
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.11448
LRS(CO)
RS(16/03/2017)
W.A.No.1065 of 2012
V.Vanaja
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Revenue Officer
The Sub-Registrar
S.MANIKUMAR
M.GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
