Allowed

V. Vasanthamani v. R. Vinod Jayakumar

Madras HC13 Jun 2017TR CMP/801/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras accepted the request to withdraw a matrimonial petition from the Coimbatore court and transfer it to the Chennai Family Court to be tried jointly, recording the respondent's endorsement and directing record transmission within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.185 of 2016 from Coimbatore to I Additional Family Court, Chennai, for joint trial with H.M.O.P.No.3910 of 2016.

V. Vasanthamani Vs R. Vinod Jayakumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

Tr.C.M.P. No.801 of 2016

¶6

and C.M.P.No.20262 of 2016

¶7

V.Vasanthamani ... Petitioner

¶8

R.Vinod Jayakumar ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer:- Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.185 of 2016 pending on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and transfer it to the file of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai and to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.3910 of 2016 pending on its file.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondent : Ms.B.Radhika

¶11

The petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.185 of 2016 from the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and to transfer it to the file of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, and to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.3910 of 2016 pending on its file.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶13

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the husband has no objection to transfer the case as sought for by the petitioner and she has made an endorsement to that effect.

¶14

Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the respondent and without deciding the issue on merits, the petition in H.M.O.P.No.185 of 2016 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and transferred to the file of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai and to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.3910 of 2016 pending on its file. The Presiding Officer, II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.185 of 2016 to the file of the I Additional Family Court, Chennai, within a period of two weeks

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶18

-s/d-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶20

True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
dm/ds
To
1. The II Additional Subordinate Judge,
Coimbatore.
2. The I Additional Family Court,
Chennai.
+1 CC to Mr.S. Sivakumar, Advocate sr 41857
Tr.C.M.P. No.801 of 2016
and C.M.P.No.20262 of 2016
AD(CO)
sp/28/6

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Vasanthamani v. R. Vinod Jayakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Vasanthamani v. R. Vinod Jayakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Kumarudeen Vs Pasumai Poonga Welfare

Rathinabai Vs E.Shanmugam

Swaminathan@Ravishankar Vs Hemapriya

S. Sathya Vs Kishore Kumar

Revathi Vs Baranidharan

Mrs.M.Illakiya Vs Mr.P.Ezhilarasu