Dismissed

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, v. Income Tax Officer

Madras HC3 Mar 2017TCA/27/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Tax Case Appeals Nos. 27 and 28 of 2016 for non-prosecution. The appellant failed to cure registry deficiencies and did not appear. The associated miscellaneous petition is closed. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated on merits.

What did the court decide?

The appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. The accompanying miscellaneous petition stands closed.

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, Vs Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 03.03.2017

¶3

Coram

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

Tax Case Appeal Nos.27 and 28 of 2016

¶6

and CMP No.479 of 2016 in TCA No.28 of 2016

¶7

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, FF, Arunachala Homes, 13/5, Sadasivam Street, Gopalapuram, Chennai-600 086. .. Appellant in both TCAs

¶8

vs. Income Tax Officer, Erstwhile Business Ward-XV(2), Presently Non-Corporate Ward 3(5), Chennai-600 034. .. Respondent in both TCAs * * *

¶9

Prayer in TCA No.27 of 2016 : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 11.09.2015, passed in M.P.No.98/MDS/2015 in ITA No.1922/MDS/2014, on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench and against the order of the Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals-VI) Chennai dt.31.3.14 in ITA.No.1462/13-14/A-VI and against the order of Assessment dt.27.12.2011 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Business Ward XV(2) Chennai in PAN No.ABIPL1589J.

¶10

Prayer : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 03.07.2015, passed in ITA No.1922/MDS/2014, on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench and against the order of the Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals-VI) Chennai dt.31.3.14 in ITA.No.1462/13-14/A-VI and against the order of Assessment dt.27.12.2011 passed by the Income Tax Officer, Business Ward XV(2) Chennai in PAN No.ABIPL1589J. * * *

¶11

For Appellant : No Appearance

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶14

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Rajiv Shakdher, J.)

¶15

Pursuant to the order dated 15.02.2017, the captioned matters have been shown in the category of default cases. It appears that the deficiency pointed out by the Registry has not been cured by the appellant. Furthermore, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

¶16

Accordingly, the captioned appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, accompanying miscellaneous petition shall stand closed.

¶17

Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Officer,
Erstwhile Business Ward-XV(2),
Presently Non-Corporate Ward 3(5),
Chennai-600 034.
2.The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Chennai.
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)VI,
Chennai-34.
gmi(co)
krd 13/4
T.C.(Appeal) No.27 and 28 of 2016

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Pravin Tex Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Customs & Central Excise

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. Anita Kumaran

Elegant Estates Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S.Visteon Automotive Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shri Gumanmal Jain

Ms.Latha Vadivel, Flat No.C, Vs Income Tax Officer