M.Sankar Nadar v. Deva Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal under S. 100 CPC allowing the appeal, setting aside the lower appellate judgment, and dismissing the suit.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal allowed; judgment and decree of A.S.No.9 of 2010 set aside; suit in O.S.No.6 of 2009 dismissed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN
P R E S E N T
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
S.A.(MD)NO.511 OF 2011
1.M.Sankar Nadar 2.S.Sundar Raj .. Appellants/Respondents/Defendants
Vs .
Deva Krishnan .. Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff
Second Appeal filed U/S 100 of the CPC, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2010, dated 29.06.2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam in reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.6 of 2009, dated 15.12.2009, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Uthamapalayam.
DECREE :This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on Thursday, the fifth day of January 2017; upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of MR.V.MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM for MR.D.NALLATHAMBI, Advocate for the Appellant and of MR.S.PARTHASARATHY, Advocate for the respondent, and having stood over for consideration till date, while allowing this Second Appeal, this Court doth order and decree as follows:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2010 be set aside and the suit dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Sankar Nadar
- appellant
S. Sundar Raj
- respondent
Deva Krishnan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court