Mariappan v. Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by Mariappan, confirming the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, against the respondents Selvaraj and Vanitha.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty First day of February Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY
SA(MD) No.427 of 2015
Mariappan
.. Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
1.Selvaraj
2.Vanitha .. Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs
This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, Appeal against the decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi, dated 23.06.2014 made in Appeal Suit No.13/2013 preferred against the decree of the Court of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai, dated 26/04/2013 made in Original Suit No.126 of 2010.
DECREE : This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this day and Upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J.Velpradeep, Advocate for the Appellant, and of Mr.S.Meenkshi Sundaram, Senior Counsel for Mr.R.T.Arivukumar, Advocate appearing for the Respondents, this Court doth order and decree as follows :-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mariappan
- respondent
1.Selvaraj
- respondent
2.Vanitha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court