Boomi, v. Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
In Second Appeal No. 825 of 2007, the Court disposed of the appeal because the parties had settled the dispute and filed a compromise memo. The memo was attached to the decree.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is disposed of. The memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:12.01.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
SECOND APPEAL NO.825 of 2007
and
MP.No.1 of 2007
1.Boomi
2.Lakshmi .. Appellants/Appellants/
Defendants
/versus/
Kannan .. Respondent/Respondent/
Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil
Procedure Code against the decree and judgment passed in
A.S.No.9 of 2006, dated 04.09.2006 on the file of learned
Subordinate Judge, Aarani dismissing the said appeal preferred
against the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.37 of 1996 on
the file of the learned District Munsif at Polur, dated 8.11.2005
For Appellants :Mr.P.Sivamani
For Respondent :Mr.R.Siddtharth for
Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
J U D G M E N T
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for
the appellants as well as the respondent that the dispute
between the parties have been settled and they have also filed
a memo of compromise to that effect.
- Recording the submission as well as the memo of compromise, the Second Appeal is disposed of. No costs. The memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. Consequently, connected Application is also closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Boomi and Lakshmi
- respondent
Kannan
Coram
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court