V.P.Sathyamurthy v. Subbulakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, counsel for the appellant submitted that the underlying dispute had been settled out of court. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
S.A.No.761 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
V.P.Sathyamurthy .. Appellant/1st Defendant
Vs.
1. Subbulakshmi
2. Sarojini ..1&2 Respondents/Plaintiffs
3. V.P.Maruthachalam (died)
4. Suganya
5. Thomas
6. Nataraj
7. Muthu
8. P.Udayakumar
9. Kaliammal
10. Radhikapriya
11. Sathana
(Respondents 5 to 8 are
already given up in the suit
by the respondents 1 and 2/plaintiffs) .. Respondents 3 to 11/
Defendants 2 to 10
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 06.10.2009 in A.S.No.54 of 2009 on the file of the First Additional District Court, Coimbatore, against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2008 in O.S.No.1600 of 1999 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.
For respondents : Mr.S.Saravanan for RR-1 & 2 R-3 died No appearance for R-4 RR-5 to 8 - given up Mr.P.Raja for RR-9 to 11
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.P.Sathyamurthy
- respondent
Subbulakshmi
- respondent
Sarojini
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court