Mrs.Pachaiyaammal v. Shanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed due to non-prosecution; appellants absent despite matter being listed for dismissal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S. A.No.588 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 and CMP.No.799 of 2017 1.Pachaiyaammal 2.Chellappa ...Appellants/Defendent 5 & 6 Vs. 1. Shanthi 2. The Assistant Engineer (O & M) T.N.E.B.Car Street, Madurantakkam Taluk, Kanchipuram District. 3. The Executive Engineer, T.N.E.B.AP.Rangan Street, Madurantakkam Taluk, Kanchipuram District.
- The Superintendent Engineer, C.E.D.C. T.N.E.B.Chengalpattu. ...Respondents/Plaintiff & Defendents 2 to 4
Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 1.10.2010 passed in A.S.No.42 of 2009 by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge, at Madurantakkam, Kanchipuram District, confirming the decree and judgment dated 31.07.2007 passed in O.S.No.420 of 1997 by the learned District Munsif Court, Madurantakkam, Kanchipuram District.
Counsel for the respondent 2 to 4 present. No representation for the appellants. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, the counsel for the appellants did not
appear before this Court. Appellants called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pachaiyaammal
- appellant
Chellappa
- respondent
Shanthi
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer (O & M) T.N.E.B.
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, T.N.E.B.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court