N. Bagyalakshmi v. S. Arokiaswamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant nor the respondent appeared to prosecute the matter before the Single Judge.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
S.A.No.358 of 2007
N.Bhagyalakshmi ... Appellant ..Vs.. S.Arokiaswamy ... Respondent Prayer: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code., praying against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.45 of 2006 dated 28.07.2006 by the VI Addl.Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree made in I.A.No.17993 of 2001 in O.S.No.7113 of 1997 dated 31.03.2003 by the VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant : No appearance(Party in person) For Respondent : No appearance JUDGMENT Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant as well as respondent. Even on the last occasion, on 18.08.2017, the matter was posted and called, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was posted on 28.08.2017 under the caption "for dismissal". It seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar nvi
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.Bhagyalakshmi
- respondent
S.Arokiaswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court