18.Now coming to the question of the proof of the Will, as per law, the defendants have examined as the attestors of the Will as Dws4 and 5. DW4, Balakrishnan, is the father-in-law of the 8th defendant and also the husband of the seventh defendant. As seen earlier, the seventh defendant is supporting the case of the defendants 1, 8 and 9, DW4 has admitted that at the time of the execution of the Will, the first defendant, the seventh defendant and even the plaintiffs were present, however, the description of the properties are not incorporated in the Will, he has further admitted that at the time of execution of the Will Ranga Reddiar was not in good health. The other attestor examined as DW5 has deposed that he has not seen the signature of Ranga Reddiar in Ex.B3. Further, he has also stated that Ranga Reddiar was not having any pen and he had put his signature using the pen of the scribe. As rightly found by the Courts below, the ink of Ranga Reddiar's signature and the scribe's writings are found to be varying. That has been positively admitted by DW5. Further, DW5 has also admitted that he used to work under the first defendant in his lands. Therefore, it could be seen that DW4 is the father-in-law of one of the beneficiaries. DW5 is a worker under D1. In such circumstances, the Courts below have doubted the evidence of DW4 & 5 to uphold the truth and validity of the Will in question. Further, the Will in question is seriously impugned by the plaintiffs. In such circumstance, the defendants, who are propounders of the Will should have taken steps to send the Will
