Appellant filed a Second Appeal under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC (Note: Text says Sec 100 but context is settlement). The Court found the matter was settled out of court based on the registered endorsement. The appeal was dismissed as settled with connected money petition closed.
Dismissed as settled out of court. Connected MP closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
Second Appeal No.256 of 2012
and M.P.No.1 of 2012
Dhanasingh .. Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
R.Gnanasekar .. Respondent/Defendant
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.10.2011 and passed in
A.S.No.19 of 2011 on the file of I Additional Sub-Court,
Cuddalore, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and
decree dated 23.11.2010 passed in O.S.No.581 of 2003 on the file
of Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.
For Appellant : Mr.D.Baskar
For Respondent : Not ready in notice.
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel Mr.D.Baskar, appearing for the appellant
submits that the matter has been settled between the parties.
He has also made an endorsement to that effect. The same is
recorded. The Second Appeal is dismissed as settled out of
Court. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvsri
To
Second Appeal No.256 of 2012
msm(co)
aa14/07/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhanasingh
R. Gnanasekar
S. Baskaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
