Marimuthu v. R. Rathinasabapathy
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn upon the appellant's submission that the underlying dispute was settled out of court.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
S.A.No.1198 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Marimuthu .. Appellant
Vs.
P.Rathinasabapathi .. Respondent
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code against the judgment and decree dated 25.03.2010 in
A.S.No.117 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Court,
Tiruchengode, against the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2006
in O.S.No.16 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court,
Thiruchengode.
For appellant : Mr.K.R.Krishnan
For respondent : Mr.C.Kulanthaivel
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the dispute between the parties had been settled out of Court and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the Second Appeal and made an endorsement on the memorandum of grounds of appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Marimuthu
- respondent
P. Rathinasabapathi
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court