The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after recording the appellant counsel's request for permission to withdraw the Original Side Appeal and the endorsement made by him.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
O.S.A.No.91 of 2013
M/s.Selvarajulu Chetty Trust, Rep., by its Sole Trustee, Mr.A.Bhaskar
... Appellant
-vs-
Dr.H.B.N.Shetty, I.A.S., (Retd.) ... Respondent
Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S. Rules and Section 15 of the Letter Patent, against the judgment and decree, dated 31.07.2012, passed in T.O.S.No.42 of 2008.
For appellant : Mr.Bharathachackaravathi for Mr.Sai Bharath & Ilan For 1st respondent : Mrs.P.Srividhya
JUDGMENT
(Judgement of this Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J. )
Accepting the reasons, assigned in the order impugned, Mr.Bharathachackaravathi, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Original Side Appeal and he has
2
S.MANIKUMAR, J. AND M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
skm
also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the same, this Original Side Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.M.K., J.) (M.G.R., J.) 06.03.2017
skm
O.S.A.No.91 of 2013
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s.Selvarajulu Chetty Trust, Rep., by its Sole Trustee, Mr.A.Bhaskar
Dr.H.B.N.Shetty IAS (Retd.)
S.Manikumar
M.Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
