Dismissed

Karunya Institute of v. Khec Technologies (I) Pvt.

Madras HC14 Sept 2017OP/1008/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed two original petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which sought to set aside an arbitral award and for remittal. The dismissal was on account of the parties filing a joint Memorandum of Compromise authorizing the withdrawal of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Original Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.

Karunya Institute of Vs Khec Technologies (I) Pvt. — Arbitration | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED 14.09.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

O.P.NO.1008 OF 2015 and O.P.No.841 of 2015

¶7

Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, represented by its Director, Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore 641 114. Petitioner in O.P.No.1008 of 2015/ 1^st respndent in O.P.No.841 of 2015 Vs 1.KHEC Technologies (I) Pvt.Ltd., .. 1^st respondent in O.P.No.1008 of 2015 / Petitioner in O.P.No.841 of 2015 2.P.Sivaprakasam, .. Arbitrator/2^nd respondent in both OPs 3.Mr.P.Sivaraman, .. Arbitrator/3^rd respondent in both OPs 4.K.D. Arcot .. 4^th respondent in both OPs

¶8

Prayer in O.P.No.1008 of 2015: Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to set aside the award dated 08.06.2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of M/s. P. Sivapprakasam, S.Sivaraman and K.D.Arcot in the matter of constructing Gents Hostel 'D'Block (Ground + 3 Floors) at Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore 641 114 in so far as it went against the Petitioner.

¶9

Prayer in O.P.No.841 of 2015: Petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for setting aside the Award dated 8.6.2015 passed by the respondents 2, 3 and 4 herein for claim Nos. 30, 48, 37, 36 and 56 and consequently allow the claims made by the petitioner with cost or in the alternative and remit the matter to the 2^nd , 3^rd and 4^th respondents to decide the above issues in accordance with the findings of this Court.

¶10

For Petitioner in OP.1008 of 2015 and respondents in OP.No.841 of 2015 : Mr. S.Doraisamy, Senior Counsel

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

¶13

DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J.

¶14

msr

¶15

For Respondent(s) in O.P.No.1008 of 2015 and petitioner in O.P.No.841 of 2015 : Mr. K.V.Ananthakrishnan

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Learned counsel Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel and Mr.K.V.Ananthakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in O.P.No.1008 of 2015 and O.P.No.841 of 2015 respectively would file a joint Memorandum of Compromise, dated 14.09.2017 duly executed by the learned counsels in O.P.No.1008 of 2015 and O.P.No.841 of 2015 authorising the counsel to withdraw the aforesaid Original Petitions.

¶18

2.The Joint Memorandum of Compromise is taken on record and the learned counsel are permitted to withdraw the Original Petitions. The Original Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected A.No.3369 of 2017 is closed.

¶19

14.09.2017

¶20

msr Speaking Order/non-speaking order

¶21

Index:yes/No

¶22

O.P.NO.1008 OF 2015 and

¶23

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶24

¶25

O.P.No.841 of 2015

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

Karunya Institute of v. Khec Technologies (I) Pvt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karunya Institute of v. Khec Technologies (I) Pvt.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanalakshmi srinivasan charit Vs M/s.Consolidated construction

M/s.Garuda Aviation Services Vs Airports Authority of India

Hyundai Engineering and Vs United India Insurance Co.

M/s.Saravana Transport Vs The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies

M/s.IndusInd BAnk Ltd. Vs Mr.Sathish Kumar.B

Cholamandalam investment Vs Mr.Mod Danish Khan