Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief under Article 226 for missing husband. Detenu voluntarily left household. Court found no illegal detention and dismissed the Habeas Corpus Petition.
Habeas Corpus Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.03.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
H.C.P.(MD) No.295 of 2017
K.Chandradevi
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The State rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Malli Police Station,Malli, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or corpus of the petitioner's husband namely, Kaleeswaran S/o.Ramar, aged about 32 years, residing at 3/155, Mettu Muilikulam, Malli Post, Srivilliputtur Taluk-626 141, Virudhunagar District before this Court by securing him from illegal custody and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jeyakumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Mohan
Addl. Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
[Order of the Court by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]
Heard Mr.B.Jeyakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The respondent police produced the detenu before this Court.
2
Sd/Assistant Registrar(AD-II)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
H.C.P.(MD) No.295 of 2017 21.03.2017
JM/SV MMS/28.03.2017/2P/4C
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the missing husband was illegally detained by the respondent police.
Whether the Captive husband should be produced before the Court and set at liberty.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Chandradevi
The State rep.by The Superintendent of Police
The Inspector of Police
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
