In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking habeas corpus for the alleged illegal detention of a minor by her mother-in-law, the Court completed an enquiry finding the allegation denied. Upon reconciliation of the parties, the petition was dismissed.
Application of habeas corpus dismissed; parties advised to sort out differences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
H.C.P. No.310 of 2017
K.Saravanan .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State represented by
Inspector of Police
W6, All Women Police Station
Aynavaram
Chennai - 600 023
2.Indhra .. Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenue/body before this Hon'ble Court and set the detenue/body minor Kavya 4 years at liberty with the presence of the natural guardian Akilandeshwari, forthwith.
For Petitioner :: Mr.S.Prabhu
For Respondents :: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Addl. Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(Made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)
Petitioner/husband has filed writ of habeas corpus petition, alleging illegal detention of minor Kavya aged about four years, by respondent No.2, mother-in-law. Upon notice, alleged detenue along with her mother, is present.
With the above observation, Habeas Corpus Petition is
dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asr
To
1. The Inspector of Police
W6, All Women Police Station
Aynavaram
Chennai - 600 023
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.Prabhu, Advocate, S.R.No.13456
SKV(CO)
RS(15/03/2017)
HCP.No.310 of 2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's allegation of illegal detention of his minor daughter by her mother-in-law is substantiated upon enquiry
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Saravanan
Indhra
S.MANIKUMAR
M.GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
