Dismissed

S.Chandran, Aged 51 Years, v. the State Represented by

Madras HC27 Feb 2017HCP/280/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Habeas Corpus petition alleging illegal detention of his daughter by the second respondent, the High Court accepted that they are related and the petitioner acknowledged this. Finding no prima facie case of illegal detention after the daughter denied torture, the Court closed the petition without issuing the writ.

What did the court decide?

The Habeas Corpus Petition was closed. No Writ of Habeas Corpus was issued.

S.Chandran, Aged 51 Years, Vs the State Represented by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 27.02.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR

¶5

and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶6

H.C.P.No.280 of 2017

¶7

S.Chandran .. Petitioner versus 1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, K2, Ayanavaram Police Station, Chennai 600 023. (Crime No.1438 of 2016) 2. M.Balamurugan @ Kutti .. Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the first respondent Police to produce the body or person of the detenue, who is the petitioner's daughter, namely, C.Jayalakshmi, before this Court and set her at liberty to the petitioner.

¶9

For petitioner : Mr.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian For 1^st respondent: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

O R D E R (Order of this Court was made by Justice S.MANIKUMAR)

¶11

C.Jayalakshmi, aged 19 years, is the daughter of the petitioner. Alleging that the 2^nd respondent is illegally detaining her daughter, the petitioner has filed this Writ of Habeas Corpus, to produce her before this Court and to set her at liberty.

¶12

Earlier, based on the complaint of the petitioner, a case in Cr.No.1438 of 2016, has been registered, under the caption, "woman missing".

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

On this day, Inspector of Police, K2 Ayanavaram Police Station, Chennai, has produced the alleged detenue, C.Jayalakshmi, before this Court. On enquiry, she submitted that the 2nd respondent is closely related to her. They were in love and married. She denied the allegation of illegal detention or torture by the 2nd respondent.

¶15

Posed with a question, as to whether, the 2nd respondent is related to the alleged detenue, Mr.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian, learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledged the same.

¶16

As the allegation of illegal detention has been emphatically denied, there is no case for issuance of any Habeas Corpus. Hence, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

¶17

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
skm
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
K2, Ayanavaram Police Station,
Chennai 600 023.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1 cc to Mr.N.Raja Senthoor Pandian Advocate sr12783

¶18

H.C.P.No.280 of 2017

¶19

lrs(co) aa16/03/2017

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Chandran, Aged 51 Years, v. the State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Chandran, Aged 51 Years, v. the State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Hotel Milestonnez India Vs The Authorised Officer

M/s.Marg Realities Ltd, Vs Authorised Officer

N.Rajendran, Vs P.Radhakrishnan

M/S. Shriram General Insurance Vs S. Pankajam

The Manager Vs Pachaiammal

United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs Selvaraj