Petitioner filed a Habeas Corpus petition to secure liberty of her son detained in police custody. Counsel withdrew the petition as the detenu was located and present in court, leading to dismissal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.No.2295 of 2017
G.Nirmala ... Petitioner -Vs1. The District Superintendent of Police, Vellore District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Ambur, Vellore District. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the petitioner's son namely G.Suresh Babu (30 Years), son of Giri Babu before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran Additional Public Prosecutor
[Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
1.We had, issued notice in this petition on 04.12.2017. On that date, on the say so of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, we had re-notified the matter to 07.12.2017.
1.1.The reason for this, was, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran's information to us, that the detenu had been located and was confined at the Airport Police Station.
2.Today, the matter was mentioned by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, in the presence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.Selvaraj, Advocate.
2.1.The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the stage of mentioning, informed us, that he had instructions to withdraw the petition.
2.2.We had, asked the learned counsel, to have the petitioner remain present, in Court.
2.3.Based on the aforesaid circumstances, we had directed, the listing of the matter today.
2.4.Accordingly, the matter, has come up for hearing, in the Afternoon session.
3.Mr.K.Selvaraj, Advocate, in the presence of the petitioner, reiterates his prayer to withdraw the petition. 3.1.An endorsement, to that effect, has been made, in the petition.
H.C.P.No.2295 of 2017
CS/04/01/18
G.Nirmala
The District Superintendent of Police, Vellore District
The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station
Rajiv Shakdher
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
