Habeas corpus petition filed for the production of the petitioner's wife. The respondent police inspector produced the detenue, rendering the relief sought infructuous. The petition was dismissed.
Petition dismissed as the detenue was produced and the relief sought became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.09.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN
H.C.P.No.1610 of 2017
L.Sridhar ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Denkanikottai Taluk,
Krishnagiri District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
AWS Police Station,
Denkanikottai,
Krishnagiri District.
4.Mr.C.M.Sampath .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus to direct the third respondent to produce the body and person of the petitioner's wife Mrs.Pooja, wife of L.Sridhar, aged about 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.M.Ananthakumar
For Respondents :Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren,Addl.P.P. for R1 to R3 ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM,J.)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to trace out and produce the detenue, by name, S.Pooja, alleged wife of the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The petitioner is present and he has been identified by his counsel.
3.The third respondent, viz., the Inspector of Police, has produced the detenue and she has been identified by the petitioner.
4.Considering the aforesaid factual circumstances, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.
In fine this habeas corpus petition is dismissed.
msk
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Krishnagiri District,
Krishnagiri.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Denkanikottai Taluk,
Krishnagiri District.
3.The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Denkanikottai,
Krishnagiri District.
4.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1C.C. to M/S.G.M.ANANTHA KUMAR Advocate SR.NO.65302
H.C.P.No.1610 of 2017
SSI (CO)
VS 06.10.2017
L.Sridhar
The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Taluk
The Inspector of Police, AWS Police Station
S.Pooja
A.SELVAM
P.KALAIYARASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
