Civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction. The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as the plaintiff failed to appear and the court noted no representation. The 3rd defendant submitted it had already taken possession.
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 03.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.S.No.92 of 2011
D.S.Nagalakshmi
.. Plaintiff
Versus
.. Defendants
The plaint is filed and numbered as Civil Suit under order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, praying for a judgment and decree:
2
plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property, more fully described in the schedule hereunder; (c) directing the defendants to pay the costs of the suit;
For Plaintiff : No Appearance For Defendants : Mr.T.Jayaramaraj, (GA), for D1 & D2 Mr.V.Raghavachari, for D3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd defendant has
submitted that he has already taken possession of the suit property. Hence, nothing survives in the suit.
No representation for the plaintiff. The plaintiff called absent. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
03.01.2017
Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No pvs
3
N.Sathish Kumar, J., pvs
C.S.No.92 of 2011
03.01.2017
The District Collector, Chennai District
The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
