Lalitha v. S.Selvaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The plaintiff in a partition suit withdrew the matter as it was settled out of court. The High Court at Madras dismissed the suit accordingly and directed the return of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; court fees returned to counsel.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.09.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.S.No.891 of 2016
in
O.A.No.1070 of 2016
Tmt.Lalitha ... Plaintiff
Versus
1. S. Selvaraj
2. S.Leela Vinothan
3. S.Ravikumar
4. S.Manohar ... Defendants
Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 & 2 CPC R/W Order 4 Rule 1 of Original Side Rules prays a) To partition the suit property by metes and bounds, and allot and deliver separate possession of 1/5th share to the plaintiff b) To pay cost.
For Plaintiff : Mr.Y.Mohamed Ghouse
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the plaintiff has made the following endorsement:
"The matter is settled out of Court. The plaintiff is withdrawing the above suit O.S.No.891 of 2016."
Coram
C.V.Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court