S.Vijayakumar v. a.Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed a suit for permanent injunction filed by a plaintiff for nonprosecution as he was called absent and not ready to tender evidence after several adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed for nonprosecution.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.S.No.422 of 2011
S.Vijayakumar
.. Plaintiff
Versus
A.Krishnan
.. Defendant
Prayer: The plaint is filed and numbered as Civil Suit under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, praying for a judgment and decree against the defendant
- a) Declaring that the action of the Defendant in interfering in any manner with the activities of the All India Overseas Bank Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Employees Welfare Association on and from 15.04.2011 on being expelled from the Primary Membership of the All India Indian Overseas Bank Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Employees Welfare Association either personally or through his men or agents as illegal and without jurisdiction.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit shall be maintained in absence of the plaintiff ready to tend evidence.
Coram
N.Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court