A civil revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court at Madras as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous and recorded an endorsement to that effect.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous and connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:05.10.2017
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP.No.1647 of 2002 and
C.M.P.No.17268 of 2002 1.M/s.Vira Constructions Company, No.781, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. Rep by its partner T.T.Vasu 2.T.T.Vasu 3.Inderjit Singh Bhusri .. Petitioners vs. J.Jyothi .. Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside/revise the order dated 22/08/2002 passed in I.A.No.10072 of 2002 in O.S.No.181 of 2002 on the file of the XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai to unconditionally allow the I.A.No.10072 of 2002 for grant of leave to defend the suit.
For Petitioner :Mr.George Cheziyan For Respondents :No Appearance
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
matter has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
M.V.MURALIDARAN, J. ub
learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
05.10.2017
(1/4)
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
ub
To
The XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court,
Chennai.
C.R.P.No.1647 of 2002
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Vira Constructions Company Rep. by T.T. Vasu and Inderjit Singh Bhusri
J. Jyothi
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
