Murugan v. Kuppusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented at hearings.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMAINAM
C.R.P.(P.D.) No.749 of 2013
- Murugan 2. Sundarammal ... Petitioners
Vs.
- Kuppusamy
- Valliammal ... Respondents
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 04.07.2012 made in I.A.No.569 of 2011 in O.S.No.250 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif, Dharmapuri District.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murugan and others
- respondent
Kuppusamy and others
Coram
S.M.Subramainam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court