The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit was disposed of and the First Appeal was pending, leaving nothing to challenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP(PD)No.4736 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
C.Chennakrishnan
... Petitioner
Vs.
N.Venkatesan ... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal orders dated 31.10.2012 passed in I.A.No.782 of 2012 in O.S.No.35 of 2009, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani
For Respondent : Mr.V.Nicholas
O R D E R
It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the
respondent that the suit itself was disposed on 30.10.2014 and the First Appeal in A.S.No.27 of 2015 is pending before the Subordinate Court, Krishnagiri. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. Hence, the prayer in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
2
M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.
vs
2.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.02.2017
vs
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
To
The District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri.
CRP(PD)No.4736 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
C.Chennakrishnan
N.Venkatesan
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
