The Madras High Court dismissed two Civil Revision Petitions on the merit of the gravity of the facts of the case on the ground that the petitioners sought to withdraw them during the hearing.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:22.02.2017
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP.Nos.4614 and 4615 of 2012
and
M.P.No.1 of 2012
1.M/s.Kanyalay and Company Rep.by its Partners. 2.Ashok Kumar K.Mehta
3.Joykumar K.Mehta
.. Petitioners in both CRPs
vs.
R.Ramachandran .. Respondent in both CRPs
Prayer in 4614 of 2012: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 18/1960 as subsequently amended by Act 23/1973, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2012 made in R.C.A.No.386 of 2008, on the file of VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, modified the order and decreetal order dated 18.03.2008 made in R.C.O.P.No.690 of 2007 on the file of X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai and allow the Civil Revision Petition.
Prayer in 4615 of 2012: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 18/1960 as subsequently amended by Act 23/1973, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2012 made in R.C.A.No.56 of 2009, on the file of VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, modified the order and decreetal order dated 18.03.2008 made in R.C.O.P.No.690 of 2007 on the file of X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai and allow the Civil Revision Petition.
2
M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.
ub
For Petitioners in both CRPs :M/s.Devanathan For Respondent in both CRPs :Mr.P.K.Sivasubramanian for R1
O R D E R
Today, when the Civil Revision Petitions are taken up for hearing,
the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
22.02.2017
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To
2.The X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
CRP.Nos.4614 and 4615 of 2012
3
M/s.Kanyalay and Company Rep.by its Partners
Ashok Kumar K.Mehta
Joykumar K.Mehta
R.Ramachandran
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
