K.Palaniappan v. M.Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petitioner sought permission to withdraw the pending Civil Revision Petition. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the revision; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
CRP.PD.No.4569 of 2013
M.P.No.1 of 2013
---
K.Palaniappan .. Petitioner
Vs
1. M.Ravi
2. Minor R.K.Arunpradeep
rep. by next friend R.Kalaiselvi
3. Satish .. Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated
29.07.2013 made in I.A.No.227 of 2013 in O.S.No.166 of 2010
on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thiruchengode.
For petitioner : Mr.R.Bharathkumar For Respondents : ...
O R D E R
Learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the present Revision and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Palaniappan
- respondent
M. Ravi
- respondent
Minor R.K.Arunpradeep
- respondent
Satish
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court