The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioners, while granting liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate forum.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge before appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.10.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP (PD) No. 3701 of 2017
1.Marimuthu
2.Rathinasamy
3.Rasakkannu
4.Sellamuthu
5.Dhanalakshmi
6.Pappa
7.Saraswthy
8.Natchimuthu .. Petitioners
Vs
1.The District Collector
The District Collector Office
Tirupur.
2.The Tasildhar
The Tasildhar Office
Dharapuram
Tirupur District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 10.08.2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharapuram passed in unnumbered suit.
For Petitioners : Mr. N. Stalin
2
D. KRISHNAKUMAR J.,
avr/ dm
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he
may be permitted to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition, with liberty to challenge before the appropriate forum. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners, to challenge before the appropriate forum. No costs.
03.10.2017
avr / dm
To The District Munsif Court Dharapuram.
CRP(PD)No. 3701 of 2017
Marimuthu, Rathinasamy, Rasakkannu, Sellamuthu, Dhanalakshmi, Pappa, Saraswthy, Natchimuthu
The District Collector, The Tasildhar
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
