Mary Infanta Sharmila Fernando v. N.Jeevanandham
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. It directed the trial court to dispose of two pending interlocutory applications within eight weeks and to conclude the suit expeditiously thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Directions to dispose of interlocutory applications within eight weeks and the main suit as expeditiously as possible.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.10.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
CRP.PD.No.3693 of 2017
Mary Infanta Sharmila Fernando ... Petitioner
Vs.
N.Jeevanandham, ... Respondent
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for a direction to dispose of O.S.No.199 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Karaikal within time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Ms.Daisy
for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy
O R D E R
According to the petitioner, the respondent has filed a suit in RCOP.No.199 of 2015 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Karaikal for permanent injunction praying for not to evict the plaintiff / respondent except due process of law. The petitioner filed written statement in the aforesaid suit. The respondent herein along with the
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court is directed to dispose of interlocutory applications and the main suit expeditiously under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Whether directions can be passed for the disposal of pending applications in the suit filed by the respondent.
If the petitioner should be granted relief to dispose of the Civil Revision Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mary Infanta Sharmila Fernando
- respondent
N. Jeevanandham
Coram
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court