Civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as infructuous since the underlying suit was already dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.3323 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
Canara Bank Rep by its Branch Manager, Park Town Branch, Chennai - 600 003.
.. Petitioner
Vs
1.R.P.Gnanamani 2.Maruthapandian 3.S.Jayaraj
.. Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.7014 of 2009 in O.S.No.1401 of 2007 dated 25.08.2009 on the file of XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai and allow the above C.R.P
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bharadwaj For Respondents : M/s.A.R.Anand for R1
2
M.V.MURALIDARAN.J.,
ub
O R D E R
It is represented by both the learned counsel appearing on either side, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
12.01.2017
ub
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
To
The XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.3323 of 2009
Canara Bank Rep by its Branch Manager, Park Town Branch, Chennai - 600 003
R.P.Gnanamani
Maruthapandian
S.Jayaraj
M.V.MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
