S.Manivannan v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC was dismissed for default as there was no appearance or representation by the petitioner on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.01.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA
C.R.P(NPD).No.332 of 2016
S.Manivannan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.UCO Bank Saidapet Branch, Chennai-15.
2.M/S.Karaneeswarar Medicals No.45, Karaneswarar koil street Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.
3.S.Chandrasekaran .. Respondents
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 01.12.2011 made in C.M.A.No.73 of 2009 on the file of the IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 24.10.2008 made in I.A.No.5821 of 2007 in O.S.No.3396 of 1998 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Manivannan
- respondent
UCO Bank Saidapet Branch, Chennai-15
- respondent
M/S.Karaneeswarar Medicals
- respondent
S.Chandrasekaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court