Vs Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution after both sides failed to appear on the hearing date. The court deemed the petitioners uninterested in proceeding.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:02.01.2017
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
CRP(PD).No.3187 of 2007
1.Matha Educational and Development Trust,
Rep. by its Founder and Treasurer Malini and Co., Trustees,
No.747, Ramanathapuram Road, Kugainallur Village,
Thiruvalam Post,
Katpadi Taluk and Vellore District.
2.Vijayakumari,
Trustee-Mother Teresa Rural Development Trust,
3, V.T.K.Nagar, C.M.C.Line,
Katpadi, Vellore - 7.
3.Victoriya
Trustee-Mother Teresa Rural Development Trust,
K.I.I.Road, Burnishpuram, Katpadi,
Vellore.
4.Yesudoss .. Petitioners
vs.
1.B.T.Kumar
2.B.T.Kannan
3.I.Einsteen
4.B.T.Ravi
5.B.T.Pandian
6.B.T.Rajavelu
7.C.Sursh
8.S.Selvi
.. Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Judgment and Decreetal order passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Vellore, in I.A.No.54 of 2006, in O.P.No.1 of 2006 by his order dated 25.08.2006, dismissed the same are not maintainable.
For Petitioners :No Appearance For Respondents :No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Matha Educational and Development Trust
- petitioner
Vijayakumari
- petitioner
Victoriya
- respondent
B.T.Kumar
- respondent
B.T.Kannan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court