Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Pachiappan Vs Amshaveni — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
Pachiappan Vs AmshaveniPachiappan v. Amshaveni

Disposed

Pachiappan v. Amshaveni

Madras HC2 Feb 2017CRP/3177/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed the civil revision petition as it was reported that the matter was already settled before the Trial Court.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.02.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

CRP(NPD)No.3177 of 2012

1.Pachiappan

2.Duriraj

3.Balasundaram

... Petitioners

Vs.

Amshaveni

... Respondent

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

CPC115

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Pachiappan
petitioner
Duriraj
petitioner
Balasundaram
respondent
Amshaveni

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 2 Feb 2017 · February
Registered: 30 Aug 2012
Case no.: CRP/3177/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M.v. Muralidaran

M/S T.a.Munusamy Mudaliar&Sons Vs K.Lakshimiammal
1 Feb 2017
A.Anandakumar, Vs Thiru.Veeshanmugamani
1 Feb 2017
Sekar, Vs v.Varadaraji
1 Feb 2017
K.Gunalan Vs Rajalakshmi Ammal
2 Feb 2017

Cite this judgement

Pachiappan v. Amshaveni, CRP/3177/2012 (MAD), decided on 2 February 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

CPC115

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

M.V.Muralidaran

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Petition closed; No costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC set aside on the submission that the matter was settled before the Trial Court. The petition was closed without costs.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed by the Subordinate Court, Dharmapuri District, in I.A.No.364 of 2011 in O.S.No.39 of 2009 dated 02.03.2012.

For Petitioner : M/s.M.Jayachandran For Respondents : M/s.P.Ezhil Nilavan

O R D E R

It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the

matter was already settled before the Trial Court.

Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for

the Respondent, this civil revision petition is closed. No costs.

02.02.2017

ub

2

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No

M.V.MURALIDARAN.,

ub

To

The Subordinate Court, Dharmapuri District.

CRP(NPD)No.3177 of 2012

02.02.2017

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.V.Muralidaran

CNR

HCMA011104402012

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

M.v. Muralidaran

Disposal

CLOSED

T.P.Kumaravel Vs P.Muthamil Selvan

2 Feb 2017

Devaraji Vs Sivaraji

2 Feb 2017