from L.I.C. Housing Finance Ltd to the tune of Rs 9,75,000/-. For which the original title deed, patta, building permit, enjoyment certificate and C.M.D.A. certificate was submitted to the L.I.C. Housing Finance Limited. Therefore the petitioner filed only the Xerox copies of the above documents at the time of filing the suit as the supporting documents of Plaint. However, the trial Court declined to mark those documents during trial, despite the case of the petitioner that all the documents are vested with the public authority. Therefore, the revision petitioner has filed I.A.No.921 of 2011 before the trial Court under Sections 63 and 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 r/w Section 30 and 151 of Civil Procedure Code to permit the revision petitioner to mark the notarized photocopies of the above documents. The said petition however erroneously came to be dismissed by the trial Court holding that “the documentary evidence is required to be proved in accordance with Law. The Court has an obligation to decide the question of admissibility of a document in secondary evidence before making endorsement thereon. From the above the petitioner has to take steps for send for documents from L.I.C. Housing Finance Limited and after getting the certified copies of the original he can only permit to substitute exhibits. Hence the notarized photocopies does not amount to its proof”. Aggrieved over the same, the present Civil Revision
