S. Dhanalakshmi v. Ponnarasi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted permission for the withdrawal of a civil revision petition and dismissed it as withdrawn, closing the connected C.M.P. without costs.
What did the court decide?
Permission for withdrawal granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; C.M.P. closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.2699 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18..02..2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Civil Revision Petition No.2699 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.12869 of 2017
S.Dhanalakshmi
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1.S.Ponnarasi
2.N.Jayaraman
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order and decretal order dated 06.06.2017 made in E.A.No.3649 of 2013 in E.P.No.2829 of 2013 in O.S.No.9452 of 2009 on the file of the learned IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Shanmuga Velayutham
For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Alaguraja
1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
S.Ponnarasi
- respondent
N.Jayaraman
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court