Murugammal v. R. Dharman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted liberty to the petitioners to raise the ground regarding the lower court's jurisdiction to allow a typographical rectification at the appellate stage rather than in revision.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to object before the Appellate Court; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.11.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
C.R.P. (NPD) No.2182 of 2017
and
C.M.P.Nos.10473 and 14740 of 2017
1.Tmt.Murugammal
2.S.Subramani
3. Arumugam .. Petitioners
Vs
R.Dharman .. Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decreetal Order dated
24.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.13526 of 2016 in O.S.No.6749 of 2012 on the
file of the XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Bijai Sundar For Respondent : Mr.B.Manivannan
O R D E R
This revision arises against the Fair and decreetal Order dated 24.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.13526 of 2016 in O.S.No.6749 of 2012 on the
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court had power to allow an amendment application for rectifying typographical errors after a decree was passed and while an appeal was pending.
Whether the revision petitioner can object to the amendment order before the appellate court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tmt. Murugammal and others
- respondent
R. Dharman
Coram
D. KRISHNAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court