A civil revision petition was dismissed. The High Court upheld the trial judge's order refusing to appoint an Advocate Commissioner, ruling that such appointment is unnecessary when there is no dispute regarding the boundary, extent, or identity of the property.
The civil revision petition was dismissed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.R.P.(PD)No.1664 of 2017
R.Arunkumar .. Petitioner Vs.
1.K.Venkatakrishnan 2.R.Revathi .. Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.02.2017 made in I.A.No.406 of 2017 in O.S.No.2960 of 2016 on the file of the learned XV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sasikumar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.02.2017 made in I.A.No.406 of 2017 in O.S.No.2960 of 2016 on the file of the learned XV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
2
3
costs.
01.06.2017
Index : Yes/No
dm/kj
4
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
dm/kj
To
The XV Assistant City Civil Court Chennai.
C.R.P.(PD)No.1664 of 2017
01.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's order dismissing an application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner in a suit for permanent injunction.
Arunkumar
Venkatakrishnan
Revathi
V.M.Veluman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
