Kuppa Bai v. Prakash D.Bajaj
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition regarding grant of leave to defend a suit was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted the matter was settled between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 31.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
C.R.P(NPD)No.1123 of 2011 and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Kuppa Bai
.. Petitioner
Vs
Prakash D.Balaji
.. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, against the order dated 29.10.2010 passed by the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.17276 of 2010 in O.S.No.6984 of 2010 in an application filed for grant of leave to defend O.S.No.6984 of 2010.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kuppa Bai
- respondent
Prakash D.Balaji
Coram
M.V.Muralidaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court