Thiagarajar Mills (P) Ltd. v. M.Krishnamoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a criminal revision petition filed to set aside an order directing further enquiry. The petition was disposed of based on the respondent's unconditional apology recorded in an affidavit, which the petitioner accepted.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case was closed with the respondent's unconditional apology accepted.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.863 of 2017
Thiagarajar Mills (P) Limited, represented through its Manager (Personnel), M.R.Jeyaprakash (47/2017), S/o M.V.Ramakrishnan, having its office at Kappalur, Madurai-625 008.
... Petitioner/Complainant
Vs.
M.Krishnamoorthy ... Respondent/Accused
PRAYER: The Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam in Cr.M.P.No.4916 of 2016, dated 27.02.2017 and direct the learned Judicial Magistrate for conducting further enquiry.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision Petition seeking to set aside an order allowing an accused's unconditional apology should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thiagarajar Mills (P) Limited
- respondent
M.Krishnamoorthy
Coram
A.M.Basheer Ahamed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court