Kubendran v. Vimala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench dismissed a criminal revision filed by a husband against a maintenance order. The court found the husband's claim that the maintenance was excessive unsubstantiated and the trial court's finding on quantum reasonable.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision case and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed, confirming the lower court's maintenance order.
What the court decided
1
Kubendran
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.06.2017
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Crl.R.C.(MD)No.463 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 ... Petitioner/Respondent
Vs.
1.Vimala 2.Minor Selva Dharshini ... Respondents/Petitioners (Minor second respondent is represented by her mother and guardian – first respondent.)
PRAYER: Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in M.C.No.37 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Thanjavur and set aside the order dated 27.08.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan
For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil ******
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the husband against the order dated 27.08.2014, passed in M.C.No.37 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Thanjavur, in and by which, the Magistrate has granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/(Rupees Five Thousand only) for the wife and Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) for the minor daughter.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the maintenance order awarded by the trial court should be set aside in a criminal revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kubendran
- respondent
Vimala
- respondent
Selva Dharshini
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court