Ismail v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal revision filed under Cr.P.C. Sections 397 and 401, the High Court dismissed the petition as abated due to the death of the sole petitioner occurring while the revision was pending.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Case was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Criminal Revision No.749 of 2011
Ismail ..Petitioner/Petitioner/Accused
Vs
State rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, Railway Protection Force, Arakkonam,
Vellore District. ..Respondent/Respondent/complainant
Prayer:-
This Criminal revision is filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Thiruvallur made in C.A.No.65 of 2010 on 19.05.2011. against the Judgement and Detenue period of the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur made in C.C.No.128/2007 dt.22.07.2010 and the quash the petitioner.
For petitioner : M/s A.R.Suresh For respondent : Mrs.M.F.Shabana, Gov. Adv.(Crl. Side)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision can be proceeded with after the death of the sole petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ismail
- respondent
State
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court