M.Devaraj v. M.Veerappan
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear via counsel or in person despite notice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.R.C.No.482 of 2016
and
Crl.MP.Nos.3185 & 3186 of 2016
M.Devaraj ... Petitioner
Vs.
M.Veerappan ... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision filed under sections 397 & 401 of
Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records and set aside
the Judgment dated 09.06.2015 made in C.A.No.13 of 2013 on the
file of the Additional Sessions Court, Namakkal confirming the
Order dated 18.03.2013 made in STC.No.781/2010 on the file of
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakjkal.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.S.Vediappan
O R D E R
When the above Criminal Revision Case was posted for
hearing on 27.04.2017, there was no representation for the
petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “ for
dismissal ”. Even today, (07.06.2017) there is no
representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or
through the counsel on record. Hence, the Civil Revision
Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
- 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Namakkal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Devaraj
- respondent
M. Veerappan
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court