This single-paragraph order dismisses a Criminal Revision Case for default due to the complete absence of the petitioner. The matter was posted for dismissal under the caption following the absence of representation.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed for default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Criminal Revision Case No.177 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
K. Dayalan ... Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
Vs
R.T. Parithi ... Respondent/Complainant
This Criminal revision case has been filed under
Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. to revise the Judgment dated
28.11.2013 in C.A.No.1 of 2013 passed by the learned District
and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, confirming the Judgment dated
21.12.2012 in S.T.C. No.3258 of 2010 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on
13.06.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the
petitioner, hence the matter was posted today under the
caption for dismissal. Even today also there is no
representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal
Revision Case is dismissed for default. Consequently,
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rsi/rrg
To
Crl.R.C.No.177 of 2014
SVI(CO)
CA(23/06/2017)
K. Dayalan
R.T. Parithi
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
