Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Murugan Vs Nalini — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
Murugan Vs NaliniMurugan v. Nalini

Dismissed

Murugan v. Nalini

Madras HC15 Jun 2017CRL RC/147/2015

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

Criminal Revision Case No.147 of 2015

in

M.P.No.1 of 2015

Murugan ... Petitioner Vs

Nalini

Rohit Varman (Minor)

2nd respondent represented by his mother

and next friend

the first respondent herein ... Respondents

Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 13.10.2014 passed in M.C.No.41 of 2011 on the file of Family Court at Pondicherry and allow the above Criminal Revision Petition.

Statutes considered

2 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Cr.P.C.397401

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Murugan
respondent
Nalini
respondent
Rohit Varman

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 15 Jun 2017 · June
Registered: 19 Feb 2015
Case no.: CRL RC/147/2015

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V. Bharathidasan

Dr.Kannan, Aged 69 Yrs Vs State Rep.by
14 Jun 2017
A.Jeevakarunyam, Aged 58 Years Vs State Rep. by
14 Jun 2017
S.Nizamuddin, Male/Aged 61 Yrs Vs State by
14 Jun 2017
A.Subash, Aged 18 Years, Vs Deputy Superintendent of
15 Jun 2017

Cite this judgement

Murugan v. Nalini, CRL RC/147/2015 (MAD), decided on 15 June 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes2

Cr.P.C.397 · 401

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

V. Bhathridasan

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

For petitioner : Mr.A.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.R.Mani Muthu

When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner produced the letter dated 01.06.2017 written by the petitioner stating that he is not willing to proceed with the case and the learned counsel for the petitioner is also made an endorsement to that effect.

In view of the letter produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not pressed. The letter produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner written by the petitioner dated 01.06.2017 shall form part of the order. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.

Sd/-

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

The Family Court, Pondicherry.

+1cc to M/s.R.Manimuthu, Advocate in sr.no.42249

Criminal Revision No.147 of 2015

VGI(CO) NR 29/06/2017

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Bhathridasan

CNR

HCMA010490722015

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

V. Bharathidasan

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED

Murali, M/a 29 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

15 Jun 2017

V.B.R. Menon, B.E., Mba(Iima), Vs P. Naresh Babu, Asst.Executive

15 Jun 2017