Allowed

M/S.Bvv Paper Industries Ltd. v. a.Nagaraj

Madras HC29 Aug 2017CRL RC/1354/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras allowed criminal revisions filed by petitioners in cheque dishonour cases. Accepting the settlement reached via Memorandum of Understanding dated 12.09.2016, the Court acquited the petitioners, compounded the offences, and ordered refund of fines and cancellation of bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

All criminal revisions allowed; offences under Section 138 of NI Act compounded; petitioners acquitted; fines refunded; bail bonds cancelled.

M/S.Bvv Paper Industries Ltd. Vs a.Nagaraj — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 29.08.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶6

Crl.R.C.Nos.1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358,
1359, 1360, 1361, 1362 and 1363 of 2011
1.M/s.BVV Paper Industries Limited,
Nallur, Saminathapuram,
Palani Taluk, Dindugul District.
2.BVV Krishnaprasad
S/o.Sathyanarayanamurthy ... Petitioners in all revisions
vs
A.Nagaraj
S/o.Arumugam Pillai ...1 st Respondent Crl.R.C.Nos.
1354 to 1358/2011
N.Tirumalaisamy
S/o.Nachimuthu Gounder ...1 st Respondent Crl.R.C.Nos.
1359 to 1363/2011
State represented by
Public Prosecutor,
Coimbatore. ... 2 nd Respondent in all revisions

¶7

Criminal Revisions filed under section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against judgments of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, passed in C.A.Nos.60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69 of 2011 on 16.08.2011 confirming the judgments of learned Judicial Magistrate VIII, Coimbatore, passed in C.C.Nos.103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

¶10

109, 110, 111 and 112 of 2006 on 18.03.2010.

¶11

For Petitioners : M/s.P.Saravana Sowmiyan For Respondents : Ms.P.V.Rajeswari [R1] Mr.V.Arul Additional Public Prosecutor [R2]

¶12

¶13

COMMON ORDER

¶14

These revisions arise against judgments of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, passed in C.A.Nos.60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 and 69 of 2011 on 16.08.2011 confirming the judgments of learned Judicial

¶15

Magistrate VIII, Coimbatore, passed in C.C.Nos.103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,

¶16

109, 110, 111 and 112 of 2006 on 18.03.2010.

¶17

Petitioners faced trial in C.C.Nos.103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109,

¶18

110, 111 and 112 of 2006 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate VIII, Coimbatore, for offences u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. On appreciation of materials before it, trial Court, under judgments dated 18.03.2010, rendered a finding of conviction and sentenced second petitioner to 2 years S.I. and fine of Rs.5,000/- i/d 6 months S.I. in each case. Appeals

¶19

preferred by petitioners/accused in C.A.Nos.60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68

¶20

and 69 of 2011 on the file of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, came to be dismissed under judgments dated 16.08.2011. Hence,

¶21

these revisions.

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

¶24

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the matter stands settled between parties. Learned counsel has also filed Memorandums of Understanding dated 12.09.2016 entered into between second petitioner and first respondents informing of settlement between parties.

¶25

Learned counsel for first respondents affirm the submission of learned

¶26

counsel for petitioners viz., that the dispute stands settled between de facto complainants and petitioners upon receipt of entire cheque amount (in each

¶27

case).

¶28

In view of Memorandums of Understanding dated 12.09.2016 and petitions filed to compound the offence signed by their respective counsel, this Court is inclined to allow these revisions. Accordingly, these Criminal Revision Cases shall stand allowed. The offences under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act shall stand compounded. Petitioners shall stand acquitted in the cases. Fine, if any, paid shall be refunded. Bail Bonds, if any, executed shall stand cancelled. Memorandums of Understanding dated 12.09.2016 and petitions filed to compound the offence shall form part of records.

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.T.SELVAM, J

Registry is directed to issue certified copies of Memorandums of

¶34

Understanding dated 12.09.2016 on due applications.

¶35

29.08.2017
Index:yes/no
Internet:yes/no
gm
To
1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge,
Coimbatore.
2.The Judicial Magistrate VIII,
Coimbatore.

¶36

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶37

Crl.R.C.Nos.1354, 1355, 1356, 1357, 1358,
1359, 1360, 1361, 1362 and 1363 of 2011

¶38

http://www.judis.nic.in

M/S.Bvv Paper Industries Ltd. v. a.Nagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Bvv Paper Industries Ltd. v. a.Nagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Satheesh Vs Sub Inspector of Police

G.Ramesh Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Arjunan Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Sree Gokulam Chit and Vs D.Latha Mettilda

Bureau of Indian Standards, Vs M/S.Thirumalla Aqua Process

G.Harikrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police